Skip to content

suggest declaring modules when file found but module not defined #142730

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 28, 2025
Merged

suggest declaring modules when file found but module not defined #142730

merged 2 commits into from
Jun 28, 2025

Conversation

bend-n
Copy link
Contributor

@bend-n bend-n commented Jun 19, 2025 •
edited
Loading

suggests declaring modules when a module is found but not defined, i.e

├── main.rs: `use thing::thang;`
└── thing.rs: `struct thang`

or

├── main.rs: `use thing::thang;`
└── thing
    └── mod.rs: `struct thang`

which currently is just

error[E0432]: unresolved import `yeah`
 --> src/main.rs:1:1
  |
1 | use thing::thang;
  |     ^^^^^ use of unresolved module or unlinked crate `thing`
  |

but now would have this nice help:

= help: you may have forgotten to declare the module `thing`. use `mod thing` in this file to declare this module.

@rustbot rustbot added the T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Jun 19, 2025
@bend-n
Copy link
Contributor Author

bend-n commented Jun 19, 2025

@rustbot label A-diagnostics

@rustbot rustbot added the A-diagnostics Area: Messages for errors, warnings, and lints label Jun 19, 2025
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view
@bend-n bend-n marked this pull request as ready for review June 20, 2025 12:00
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jun 20, 2025

r? @petrochenkov

rustbot has assigned @petrochenkov.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Jun 20, 2025
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view
@bend-n bend-n force-pushed the suggest_declaring_modules_when_file_found_but_module_not_defined branch from 7174cb4 to 397c51b Compare June 20, 2025 13:41
petrochenkov
petrochenkov reviewed Jun 23, 2025
View reviewed changes
@petrochenkov petrochenkov added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jun 23, 2025
@bend-n bend-n force-pushed the suggest_declaring_modules_when_file_found_but_module_not_defined branch from c1a4a41 to 18ca511 Compare June 23, 2025 17:13
@petrochenkov petrochenkov added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Jun 24, 2025
petrochenkov
petrochenkov reviewed Jun 24, 2025
View reviewed changes
@petrochenkov petrochenkov added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jun 24, 2025
@bend-n bend-n force-pushed the suggest_declaring_modules_when_file_found_but_module_not_defined branch from 18ca511 to 184ef96 Compare June 24, 2025 17:56
@petrochenkov
Copy link
Contributor

Could you also add a new test exercising the various naming schemes (like …/x/y/mod.rs and others) for the module file?

@bend-n bend-n force-pushed the suggest_declaring_modules_when_file_found_but_module_not_defined branch from 184ef96 to 2f55dce Compare June 24, 2025 18:12
@bend-n bend-n force-pushed the suggest_declaring_modules_when_file_found_but_module_not_defined branch from 2f55dce to 3583423 Compare June 24, 2025 18:13
@bend-n
Copy link
Contributor Author

bend-n commented Jun 24, 2025

Could you also add a new test exercising the various naming schemes (like …/x/y/mod.rs and others) for the module file?

im not sure how to make a test with a normal directory structure? everything seems to use #[path = auxiliary/]...

@petrochenkov
Copy link
Contributor

Well, tests/ui/modules_and_files_visibility/mod_file_disambig.rs caught some file to report, the new test can probably do something similar to that case.

@bend-n
Copy link
Contributor Author

bend-n commented Jun 26, 2025

@rustbot ready

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Jun 26, 2025
petrochenkov
petrochenkov reviewed Jun 26, 2025
View reviewed changes
@petrochenkov petrochenkov added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jun 26, 2025
@bend-n bend-n force-pushed the suggest_declaring_modules_when_file_found_but_module_not_defined branch 2 times, most recently from f2c196e to 62c2fa3 Compare June 26, 2025 17:40
@bend-n
Copy link
Contributor Author

bend-n commented Jun 26, 2025

@rustbot ready

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Jun 26, 2025
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view
@bend-n bend-n force-pushed the suggest_declaring_modules_when_file_found_but_module_not_defined branch from 62c2fa3 to 8fef7b9 Compare June 26, 2025 18:18
@petrochenkov
Copy link
Contributor

r=me with #142730 (comment) addressed.
@rustbot author

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jun 26, 2025
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jun 26, 2025

Reminder, once the PR becomes ready for a review, use @rustbot ready.

@bend-n bend-n force-pushed the suggest_declaring_modules_when_file_found_but_module_not_defined branch from 8fef7b9 to 57cb419 Compare June 27, 2025 05:08
@bend-n
Copy link
Contributor Author

bend-n commented Jun 27, 2025

@bors r=petrochenkov

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jun 27, 2025

@bend-n: 🔑 Insufficient privileges: Not in reviewers

@petrochenkov
Copy link
Contributor

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jun 27, 2025

📌 Commit 57cb419 has been approved by petrochenkov

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Jun 27, 2025
@matthiaskrgr matthiaskrgr mentioned this pull request Jun 27, 2025
Merged
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 27, 2025
@bors
Auto merge of #143116 - matthiaskrgr:rollup-zy9ez06, r=matthiaskrgr
d41e12f 
Rollup of 9 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #139858 (New const traits syntax)
 - #140809 (Reduce special casing for the panic runtime)
 - #142730 (suggest declaring modules when file found but module not defined)
 - #142806 (Normalize before computing ConstArgHasType goal in new solver)
 - #143046 (const validation: properly ignore zero-sized UnsafeCell)
 - #143092 (const checks for lifetime-extended temporaries: avoid 'top-level scope' terminology)
 - #143096 (tag_for_variant: properly pass TypingEnv)
 - #143104 (hir_analysis: prohibit `dyn PointeeSized`)
 - #143106 (gce: don't ICE on non-local const)

Failed merges:

 - #143036 (Remove support for `dyn*` from the compiler)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 190a1a7 into rust-lang:master Jun 28, 2025
10 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.90.0 milestone Jun 28, 2025
rust-timer added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 28, 2025
@rust-timer
Unrolled build for #142730
470c2ca 
Rollup merge of #142730 - bend-n:suggest_declaring_modules_when_file_found_but_module_not_defined, r=petrochenkov

suggest declaring modules when file found but module not defined

suggests declaring modules when a module is found but not defined, i.e
```
├── main.rs: `use thing::thang;`
└── thing.rs: `struct thang`
```
or
```
├── main.rs: `use thing::thang;`
└── thing
    └── mod.rs: `struct thang`
```
which currently is just
```rust
error[E0432]: unresolved import `yeah`
 --> src/main.rs:1:1
  |
1 | use thing::thang;
  |     ^^^^^ use of unresolved module or unlinked crate `thing`
  |
```
but now would have this nice help:
```text
= help: you may have forgotten to declare the module `thing`. use `mod thing` in this file to declare this module.
```
github-actions bot pushed a commit to rust-lang/miri that referenced this pull request Jun 28, 2025
@bors
Auto merge of #143116 - matthiaskrgr:rollup-zy9ez06, r=matthiaskrgr
9a007c9 
Rollup of 9 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang/rust#139858 (New const traits syntax)
 - rust-lang/rust#140809 (Reduce special casing for the panic runtime)
 - rust-lang/rust#142730 (suggest declaring modules when file found but module not defined)
 - rust-lang/rust#142806 (Normalize before computing ConstArgHasType goal in new solver)
 - rust-lang/rust#143046 (const validation: properly ignore zero-sized UnsafeCell)
 - rust-lang/rust#143092 (const checks for lifetime-extended temporaries: avoid 'top-level scope' terminology)
 - rust-lang/rust#143096 (tag_for_variant: properly pass TypingEnv)
 - rust-lang/rust#143104 (hir_analysis: prohibit `dyn PointeeSized`)
 - rust-lang/rust#143106 (gce: don't ICE on non-local const)

Failed merges:

 - rust-lang/rust#143036 (Remove support for `dyn*` from the compiler)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
flip1995 pushed a commit to flip1995/rust-clippy that referenced this pull request Jul 10, 2025
@bors
Auto merge of #143116 - matthiaskrgr:rollup-zy9ez06, r=matthiaskrgr
06a87e9 
Rollup of 9 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang/rust#139858 (New const traits syntax)
 - rust-lang/rust#140809 (Reduce special casing for the panic runtime)
 - rust-lang/rust#142730 (suggest declaring modules when file found but module not defined)
 - rust-lang/rust#142806 (Normalize before computing ConstArgHasType goal in new solver)
 - rust-lang/rust#143046 (const validation: properly ignore zero-sized UnsafeCell)
 - rust-lang/rust#143092 (const checks for lifetime-extended temporaries: avoid 'top-level scope' terminology)
 - rust-lang/rust#143096 (tag_for_variant: properly pass TypingEnv)
 - rust-lang/rust#143104 (hir_analysis: prohibit `dyn PointeeSized`)
 - rust-lang/rust#143106 (gce: don't ICE on non-local const)

Failed merges:

 - rust-lang/rust#143036 (Remove support for `dyn*` from the compiler)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@petrochenkov petrochenkov petrochenkov left review comments

Assignees

@petrochenkov petrochenkov

Labels
A-diagnostics Area: Messages for errors, warnings, and lints S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
1.90.0
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
5 participants
@bend-n @rust-log-analyzer @rustbot @petrochenkov @bors